Critically assess the reasoning of the Supreme Court in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd  UKSC 26 by making specific reference to their Lordships discussion of the test opined in American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd  AC 396 which ought to be applied when considering an application for the grant ( or otherwise) of an interim injunction.
I will be analysing the reasoning of the Supreme Court’s decision in PJS v News Group Newspapers ltd 2016, by making reference to the test set out in the American Cyanamid v Ethicon ltd 1975 case. The Supreme Court in PJS ruled on the validity and application of the tests set out in American, when deciding whether an interim injunction is appropriate relief.
I will firstly explore the SC’s reasoning for dismissing the CA’s application of the ECHR. Secondly I will explore the American ‘balance of probabilities’ theory which the SC rule was incorrectly placed by the CA. I will be referencing the case of Double Glazing Glasgow in my findings too.